RESUMO
Bone biopsy is still the gold standard tool to evaluate either trabecular or cortical bone, though the quantitative computed tomography of the vertebrae (QCT), a non-invasive technique, could be useful to evaluate bone structure in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Cortical bone microstructure derangements have been associated with poor outcomes in the general population. An association between trabecular bone density, assessed by QCT, and bone volume and microarchitecture by histomorphometry, has been previously documented. This relationship has not yet been fully evaluated in cortical bone in the CKD scenario. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship among vertebrae density measured by QCT, structural histomorphometric parameters of cortical bone and biochemical and hormonal data in 50 CKD stage 2-5ND patients. This was a post hoc analysis of a cross-sectional study where cortical porosity and cortical thickness were analyzed in undecalcified bone samples from the iliac crest. The cortical bone density was obtained by QCT from the thoracic vertebrae. The patients were 52 ± 10 years, 68% men, 30% diabetes and the estimated glomerular filtration rate 34 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2. Cortical porosity was 4.6% (3.6; 6.6) and cortical thickness was 578.4 ± 151.8 µm, while cortical bone density was 149.2 ± 58.3 HU. Cortical density correlated with cortical thickness (p = 0.001) but not with cortical porosity (p = 0.30). Higher porosity was associated with older age (p = 0.02), higher levels of PTH (p = 0.04) and lower renal function (p = 0.03), while smaller thickness was associated with higher levels of PTH (p = 0.02). Lower density was associated with older age (p = 0.02) and higher levels of PTH (p = 0.01). In conclusion, cortical bone density measured by QCT was able to mirror the cortical thickness of bone biopsy in pre-dialysis CKD patients. In addition, PTH action on cortical bone can be already seen in this population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vascular calcification progression has been associated with the loss of trabecular bone in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. There are few data evaluating the relationship between cortical bone loss and vascular calcification in this population. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the association between changes in cortical bone density and coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression in non-dialyzed CKD patients. METHODS: Changes of cortical and trabecular bone, and changes of calcium score, were analyzed using vertebral tomographic images from a prospective study. Automatic delineation of the cortical bone layer was performed by Image J software, and trabecular bone was determined by selecting a region of interest using Vitrea 2® software. Cortical and trabecular bone density (BD) were expressed in Hounsfield Units (HU), and coronary artery calcium score in Agatston Units (AU). RESULTS: Seventy asymptomatic patients [57.8 ± 10.2 years, 63% males, 20% diabetic, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) = 37.3 (24.8-51.3) mL/min/1.73m2] were followed for 24 months. The mean cortical and trabecular BD did not change over time. While 49 patients lost either bone, 29 (41%) patients lost cortical [- 4.4%/year (ranging from - 7.15 to - 0.5)] and 39 (56%) lost trabecular bone [- 3.15%/year (- 13.7 to - 0.25)]. There was no association between cortical and trabecular BD changes (p = 0.12). CAC was observed in 33 (46%) patients at baseline, and 30 (91%) of them showed CAC progression. While an inverse correlation between trabecular bone and calcium score changes was observed (p = 0.001), there was no correlation between cortical bone and calcium score changes (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: CKD patients experience either cortical or trabecular bone loss over time, but these changes do not take place simultaneously in all patients. Cortical, unlike trabecular bone loss, is not associated with vascular calcification progression in these patients.
